Mr. Roland Watkins via email: arb@nmb.gov
Director of Arbitration/NRAB Administrator
National Mediation Board
1301 K Street N.W., Suite 250 East
Washington, D.C. 20572

Dear Mr. Watkins:

Incident to the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) filed in Federal Register 8-6-03 (DOC 03-20085), the National Association of Railroad Referees wishes to comment and be heard.
NARR has been on record before this agency dating back to November 9, 1971, concerning the timely resolution of grievances. In a letter from the then Chairman, George Ives, it was opined that "the NMB does not have authority to unilaterally establish rules and procedures for the operation of NRAB."

At our urging, the NMB established a joint committee to review this important subject. The NMB then suggested that any recommendations from persons serving as referees be referred to this committee. Since that date, we have transmitted our concerns and proposals to that joint committee. That committee grew to be known as the Section III Committee. By joint action of the parties, NARR was invited to sit with the Section III Committee to further cooperation and resolve deadlocks on a more expeditious basis. We find the NMB’s current ANPRM violates that agreement and understanding.
 
The history of innovative contributions that NARR has made to the parties included restructuring the grievance machinery to provide more rapid and economic adjudication of disputes. We believe referees and the parties can make more progress in the design of a timely process.

The individual referee salary compensation is the lowest of any agency currently administering dispute resolution. This issue must be discussed in any attempt to improve the administration of case processing.

The stated goal of the new procedures lack specificity. What time restraints exist when the NRAB limits the days referees can work? e.g. for August, referees were not allowed more than eight (8) days.

The Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking calls for consolidation of similar cases. This is similar but very different to a previous proposal made by NARR. Who on the NMB staff will decide? Who will play arbitrator or referee?

The NARR is prepared to meet with the parties and suggest other recommendations to help NMB fulfill its statutory responsibilities for the administration of the NRAB. To that end, the following desire to be heard at a public meeting and ask to be advised well in advance of such meeting.

Sincerely,
Francis X. Quinn, President
Vice Presidents: James Conway, Elizabeth Wesman, John LaRocco, and Edward Suntrup
Ann Kennis, Secretary
Past Presidents: David Vaugh and Herb Marx
and NRAB Practitioners

FXQ/kk